Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:22256
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3562 of 2022 1 - Vikas Kumar Agrawal S/o Rajendra Kumar Agrawal Aged About 40 Years R/o House No. 49, Kaserpara, Chakradhar Nagar Chowk, Raigarh Chhattisgarh. 2 - Pankaj Kumar Agrawal S/o Subhash Kumar Agrawal Aged About 37 Years R/o Plot No.30 And 31, Chaitanya Nagar, Dhimrapur Road, Raigarh Chhattisgarh.
.... Petitioners versus 1 - Bank Of India Through Its Zonal Manager, Raipur Zonal Office, G.D. Sheshnilayam, Tatyapara Chowk, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Authorised Officer And Chief Manager, Bank Of India, Raipur Zonal Office, G.D. Sheshnilayam, Tatyapara Chowk, Raipur Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Vedant Shadangi, Advocate For Respondents : Ms. Shtruti Jha, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Anand Shukla, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge
Order on Board 12.05.2026 1 Mr. Vedant Shadangi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, submits that the petitioners do not wish to prosecute the present writ petition any further at this stage and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the same with liberty to file an appropriate application/representation before the competent authorities concerned in accordance with law. YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.05.12 18:36:23 +0530
2 2
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the respondents have no objection to the prayer so made on behalf of the petitioners. 3 Considering the submission advanced by learned counsel for the parties and as the petitioners seek withdrawal of the present writ petition with liberty as prayed for, the prayer is allowed. 4 Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty reserved in favour of the petitioners to approach the competent
authorities
by
filing
appropriate application/representation, as may be permissible under law. 5 It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and all issues are left open to be considered by the competent authority in accordance with law.
Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge Yogesh