Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20143 (AP)

Tunti Chinakka v. The State of A.P.

WP/8363/2019 · 2026-03-17

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010193682019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 8363/2019 Between: 1. TUNTI CHINAKKA,, W/O RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC- HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO.3/209, THOTAPALEM VILLAGE, NANDALUR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT, 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, RAJAMPET, KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, NANDALUR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in not considering the representation dated 27-12-2018 and 8-3-2019 of the petitioner for issuing E-pattadar passbooks to the petitioner and incorporate to issue E-passbooks and title deeds in the name of the petitioner lands for an extent of Ac.1-55 cents in Sy.No.62/6, an extent of Ac1-55 cents in Sy.No.62/7 of T.V. Puram Village, Nandalur Mandal, Kadapa 2 JS,J W.P.No.8363/2019 District as illegal, arbitrary and consequent direct the respondents 3 and 4 to issue the E-pattadar passbooks and title deeds in respect of the above petitioner land, and such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper in circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to consider the representations dated 27-12-2018 and 8-3-2019 of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders thereon, pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V VENKATA RAVI SANKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 JS,J W.P.No.8363/2019 The Court made the following ORDER: The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking a direction to the 4th respondent to conduct an enquiry, pass orders on the representation dated 27.12.2018 and consequently to restore the petitioner’s name in the revenue records. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the petitioner has not provided sufficient proof that the representation was duly addressed to the respondents. Conversely, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that acknowledgment material is available on record, confirming the submission of the representation. 3. This Court observed that the said representations have been pending before the respondent authorities since 2018, given the long pendency, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the matter by directing the respondents to consider and pass orders on the representation made by the petitioner, after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and any other interested parties. Such final orders shall be passed on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 4. Accordingly, with the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 18.03.2026 RSD 4 JS,J W.P.No.8363/2019 311 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 8363/2019 Dated: 18.03.2026 RSD