Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20137 (AP)

KOTURU SAI SUPRIYA v. The Principal ChiefSecretary

WP/8293/2019 · 2026-02-03

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010191182019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 8293 OF 2019 Between: 1. KOTURU SAI SUPRIYA,, D/o Late Kuppa Swamy, Age 30 Years, Occupation Social Worker, Caste (Mudeleyar), R/o. Pogagottam Colony, Naidupeta town and mandal, S.P.S.R. Nellore District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The Principal ChiefSecretary, (Home Department) Secretariate Amaravathi, State of Andhra Pradesh 2. The Director General of Police, , State of Andhra Pradesh. Mangalagiri, Guntur dist.. 3. The Superintendent of Police, , S.P.S.R. Nellore District. 4. The Station House Officer, Police Station Naidupeta, S.P.S.R. Nellore District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue writ order as direction more particularly in nature of Writ of Mandamus or other appropriate order declaring the in action of the Respondent No. 4 and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to Register FIR and to conduct investigation and to file charge Sheet before the jurisdictional Court and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 to Register FIR and to conduct investigation and to file charge Sheet before the jurisdictional Court and pass in the interest of justice, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: BODA RAKESH NAIK Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 8293/2019 ORDER: No representation for the petitioner. On 07.01.2026 also, there was no representation for the petitioner, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 04.02.2026 Dvs 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 153 WRIT PETITION NO: 8293/2019 Date: 04.02.2026 Dvs