1 2026:CGHC:23341 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 186 of 2021 1 - Kripal Singh Kanwar S/o Sirnam Singh Kanwar Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Mahora, Tahsil Katghora, District Korba Chhattisgarh. --- Appellant(s) versus 1 - Basant Kumar Tanwar S/o Ghanshyam Tanwar Aged About 24 Years R/o Pandikhurd, Police Chowki Korbi, P.S. Pasan, District Korba Chhattisgarh. 2 - Rajiv Ranjan Rai S/o Awadhesh Rai R/o MIG 89, Shivaji Nagar Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh. 3 - National Insurance Company Ltd. Through Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd. Branch Office Near Bandhan Bank, Kosabadi, Korba, Tahsil And District Korba Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) MAC No. 176 of 2021 1 - Mohar Singh S/o Late Shri Chamra Singh Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Kairabahar, Bhanderkhoh, Tahsil Pali, District Korba, Chhattisgarh ---Appellant(s) Versus 1 - Basant Kumar Tanwar S/o Ghanshyam Tanwar Aged About 24 Years Through Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd. Branch Office Near Bandhan Bank, Kosabadi, Korba, Tahsil And District Korba, Chhattisgarh 2 - Rajiv Ranjan Rai, S/o Awadhesh Rai, R/o M I G 89, Shivaji Nagar Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh BHOLA NATH KHATAI Digitally signed by BHOLA NATH KHATAI Date: 2026.05.18 11:44:14 +0530 2 3 - National Insurance Company Ltd. Through Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd. Branch Office Near Bandhan Bank, Kosabadi, Korba, Tahsil And District Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Appellants : None For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Anil Gulati, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order On Board 15/05/2026 1. Both appeals under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act have been filed against the impugned award dated 19.01.2021 passed by the Additional Tribunal Katghora of Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Katghora, District Korba (CG) in Claim Cases No.50/2018 & 54/2018. 2. On the previous dates of hearing, i.e., 20.06.2025 & 23.03.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. 3. Today, when the matter was called for hearing, there was again no representation on behalf of the appellants, which shows that the appellants are no longer interested in prosecuting the appeals. 4. Hence, in the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellants, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeals for want of prosecution. 5. Accordingly, both appeals stand dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) JUDGE Khatai