APHC010188202021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 10277/2021 Between: 1. GANGIREDDY SIVA RAMA KRISHNA PRASAD, , S/O. VENKTA RAMAYYA AGE 63 YEARS, R/ O. H. NO. 2-110, MANTADA. VILLAGE PAMIDIMUKKALA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PR 86 RD DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, AMRAVATI, KRISHNA DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM 4. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PAMARRU, KRISHNA DISTRICT 5. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PAMIDIMUKKALA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 6. THE MANTADA GRAM PANCHAYAT, MANTADA, PAMIDIMUKKALA MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT, REP BY ITS SECRETARY 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate order or direction more particularly, one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in resorting to construct Rythu Bharosa Kendram building in the premises of Gram Panchayat Office, Mantada Gram Panchayat contrary to the resolution of the 6th respondent Gram Panchayat vide resolution No. 4 dated 29.04.2021 as illegal, arbitrary, ultra-virus, contrary to interest of 6th respondent Gram Panchayat and against to the principles of natural justice and consequentially direct the respondents not to make any constructions in the Premises of Gram Panchayat Office, Mantada Gram Panchayat contrary to the resolution No. 4 dated 29.04.2021 in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to construct Rythu Bharosa Kendaram building in the premises of Gram Panchayat Office, Mantada Gram Panchayat contrary to the resolution of the 6th respondent Gram Panchayat vide resolution No. 4 dated 29.04.2021 pending disposal of the above writ petition in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI (SC FOR ZPP MPP AND GRAM PAN) 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following: ::ORDER:: Sri K.Ramesh Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Dated: 11.03.2026 SNI 4 101 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.10277 OF 2021 Dated: 11.03.2026 SNI