Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20130 (PNJ)

DEEPA RANI AND ANR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/5864/2026 · 2026-05-18

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-5864 IN THE (175) DEEPA RAN STATE OF H CORAM: Present: MANISHA B 1. Constitution o the official res petitioners at t representation 2. they are maj relationship an parents and re living with th liberty, they se 5864-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CRW Date of RANI AND ANOTHER Versus OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Mr. Ajay Aggarwal, Advocate for Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryan ****  HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been fil tion of India seeking issuance of a w ial respondents No.2 and 3 to protec at the hands of respondents No.4 an tation dated 17.05.2026 (Annexure P It is submitted by the learned cou e major. They are in love. Their hip and threats have even been extend and relatives to kill her. She has left ith the petitioner No.2. Apprehendin they sent representation dated 17.05.20 JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRWP-5864-2026 (O&M) ate of decision : 18.05.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondents E MANISHA BATRA ate for the petitioners aryana een filed under Article 226 of the of a writ of mandamus directing protect the life and liberty of the and 5 and take action on their ure P-3). ed counsel for the petitioners that Their parents are against their extended to petitioner No.1 by her as left her house and has started hending danger to their lives and .2026 to the respondent No.2 AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.18 19:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-5864 but the same h petition. 3. 4. of respondents to supply the c 5. learned State their relationsh the veracity of the sanctity o disposed of w Police, Jind to 17.05.2026 (A necessary step is found. 6. the petitioners them.  18.05.2026 Amit Sharma 5864-2026 (O&M) (2) same has not been taken into consider Notice of motion. Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryan ndents No.1 to 3, at this stage. The pet y the copy of the petition to her. I have heard learned counsel fo State counsel and without going into ationship as well as without entering u city of the averments made in the peti ctity of relationship or age of the of with a direction to the responde to look into the matter and dispose (Annexure P-3) in accordance y step, if any, genuine threat to life a It is made clear that this order s ioners from legal action for violation o Whether speaking/reasoned:    nsideration and hence, the present Haryana, accepts notice on behalf he petitioners’ counsel is directed sel for the petitioners as well as g into the question of legality of ering upon an exercise to evaluate he petition and also with regard to f the petitioners, this petition is spondent No.2-Superintendent of dispose of the representation dated with law and also to take life and liberty of the petitioners rder shall not be taken to protect ation of law, if any, committed by (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE ned:- Yes/No   AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.18 19:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.