- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27474 CRL.P No. 5308 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5308 OF 2019 BETWEEN: 1. MR KODIHALLI CHANDRASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, S/O LATE MR. R/AT NO.51, 1ST FLOOR, 2ND MAIN, 8TH CROSS, H.B.C.S., CHANDRA LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560 040. 2. MR.SIDDAHANUMAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, S/O LATE MR.VENKATAIAH, R/AT NO.8, 2ND 'A' CROSS, NEAR VEERA ANJANEYA TEMPLE, NAGARABHAVI, BENGALURU-560 072. 3. MR.RANGASWAMY GOWDA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, S/O MR. R/AT NO.51, 2ND FLOOR, 2ND MAIN, 8TH CROSS, H.B.C.S. CHANDRA LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560 040. 4. MRS.MEENAKSHI AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, W/O MR.KODIHALLI CHANDRASHEKAR, R/AT 51, 1ST FLOOR, 2ND MAIN, 8TH CROSS, 1ST FLOOR, 2ND MAIN, 8TH CROSS, H.B.C.S. CHANDRA LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560 040. …PETITIONERS [BY SRI G. SANJAY, ADVOCATE (AB)] Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27474 CRL.P No. 5308 of 2019 AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY THE SHO, VIJAYANAGAR POLICE STATION, BENGLAURU CITY REP BY SPP, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. MRS.GOWRAMMA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, W/O MR.G.BYRAIAH, 3. MR.G.BYRAIAH AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS, S/O LATE MR.GAVI SIDDAPPA, THE RESPONDENTS NO.2 & 3 ARE R/AT NO.39/1 (NEW) 2373A (OLD) 1ST MAIN ROAD, 1ST MAIN, 9TH CROSS, R.P.C. LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 040. …RESPONDENTS [BY SRI M.R.PATIL, HCGP FOR R1; SRI SHRIDHARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3 (AB)] THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.617/2019 PENDING CONSIDERATION ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED XXIV ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT BENGALURU, REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.420,120-B R/W SEC.34 OF IPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27474 CRL.P No. 5308 of 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Learned HCGP for respondent no.1 is present. None appears for petitioners. Even on previous occasions, there has been no representation. Despite being cautioned of appropriate orders in case of continued absence indicates that petitioners are not diligently pursuing petition. Hence, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE GRD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22