Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20125 (JHR)

RAJU YADAV @ RAJU KUMAR YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./1129/2026 · 2026-07-10

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:20524 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.1129 of 2026 ------ Raju Yadav @ Raju Kumar Yadav, aged about 31 years, S/o Bhola Yadav, R/o Village-Gurdi, P.O.-Naudiha Khajuria, P.S.-Chattarpur, District-Palamu. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Prashant Kr. Rai, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-10-07-2026 Heard the parties. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer for restoration of Cr.M.P. No.904 of 2025 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 25.04.2025. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Cr.M.P. No.904 of 2025 stood dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 25.04.2025 for filing the supplementary affidavit peremptorily within four weeks. It is next submitted that because the pairvikar was out of station due to some medical emergency, therefore, he could not come to court, hence, the petitioner could not file the said supplementary affidavit within the stipulated time; which resulted in dismissal of the said Cr.M.P. No.904 of 2025 for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 25.04.2025. It is next submitted that non-compliance of peremptory order dated 25.04.2025 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.904 of 2025 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No.904 of 2025 be restored to its original file. Learned counsel appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the facts of this case, Cr.M.P. No.904 of 2025 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list Cr.M.P. No.904 of 2025 before the concerned Bench after a week. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 10/07/2026 Abhiraj/