Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20123 (JHR)

JITENDRA DAS ALIAS JITENDRA KUMAR DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4988/2026 · 2026-07-14

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:20872 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4988 of 2026 Jitendra Das @ Jitendra Kumar Das, aged about 20 years, son of Paresh Mahra … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … ... Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, APP --- 03/14.07.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 26.11.2025 in connection with Cyber Crime Case No. 24 of 2026for the offences registered under Sections 111(2) (b), 111 (3), 111(4), 319 (2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) & 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 read with Section 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) & 84 (C) of the Information Technology Act, pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has one antecedent of the similar nature, and in the present case one mobile one SIM and e-walletshave been found and one victim has been identified. The petitioner is in custody since 26.11.2025 and the charge has already been framed, but no witness has been examined so far. The bail application of the petitioner was earlier withdrawn. However, two co-accused persons have been enlarged on bail in B.A. No. 1405 of 2026 vide order dated 17.04.2026 and B.A. No. 1302 of 2026 vide order dated 10.03.2026. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, hedoes not dispute the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the custody of the petitioner, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like 2026:JHHC:20872 2 amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge- II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Deoghar, in connection withCyber Crime Case No. 24 of 2026 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. 7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 8. The learned counsel for the State is directed to ensure that the witnesses are promptly produced before the trial court. 9. Learned counsel for the State is directed to communicate this order to the Superintendent of Police of the concerned district and the Director, Prosecution for compliance. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 14.07.2026 Uploaded on 14.07.2026 Pramanik/