Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20122 (PAT)

Munilal Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./40768/2026 · 2026-06-24

Chandra Shekhar Jha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40768 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2026 Thana- BANNUBAGICHA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Munilal Yadav Son of Late Prasad Yadav Resident of Village- Jankidih (Beldariya), P.S.- Bannu Bagicha, District- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bhim Sen Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 24-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The accused-petitioner, named in the F.I.R., is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bannu Bagicha P.S. Case No. 21 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 352, 351(2), 303, 109 & 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 (in short, the ‘B.N.S.’). 3. The allegation against the petitioner is to assault the informant and her son namely, Surendra Yadav during the course of occurrence, where other named co-accused persons alleged to assault the family members of the informant. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40768 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026 2/3 petitioner submitted that the occurrence took place due to neighbourhood dispute and differences, where both parties received injury, but fairly conceded that no any criminal case was initiated by the petitioner’s side against the informant and others for the same occurrence. It is submitted that upon medical examination, nature of injury, as alleged to be inflicted by this petitioner upon Surendra Yadav, found simple in nature, negating intention to cause death. 5. Explaining criminal antecedent, it is submitted that petitioner found involved in one more criminal case, in which he is on bail. 6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 7. In view of the aforesaid factual submissions and by taking note of the fact as the injury as alleged to inflicted by the petitioner on the son of the informant, upon medical examination, found simple in nature, prima facie negate the intention to cause death, accordingly, above-named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from this order, is directed to be Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40768 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026 3/3 enlarged on bail on furnishing of bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Lakhisarai/concerned court in connection with Bannu Bagicha P.S. Case No. 21 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C/Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (in short “B.N.S.S.”). Rajeev/- (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) U T