Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20120 (CHH)

AMARNATH JAIN v. CHHATTISGARH STATE ANTYAVASAI SAHAKARI VITTA EVUM VIKAS NIGAM

WPS/6005/2021 · 2026-05-14

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:23228 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6005 of 2021 1 - Amarnath Jain S/o Gaya Ram Jain Aged About 51 Years Working As Field Officer/chief Instructor Jila Antyavasayi Sahkari Vikas Samiti Maryadit Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Jeevanram Khutte S/o Late Nanakiram Khutte, Aged About 55 Years Working As Field Officer/chief Instructor Jila Antyavasayi Sahkari Vikas Samiti Maryadit Naya Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Shrikant Jha S/o N.N. Jha Aged About 53 Years Working As Field Officer/chief Instructor, Jila Antyavsayi Sahkari Vikas Samaiti Maryadit Ambikapur Sarguja (Chhattisgarh) 4 - Shyamal Dash S/o Nani Gopal Dash Aged About 53 Years Working As Field Officer/chief Instructor Jila Antyavsayi Sahkari Vikas Samiti Maryadit Durg (Chhattisgarh) 5 - Kamlesh Kumar Dewangan S/o Baliram Dewangan Aged About 52 Years Working As Field Officer/chief Instructor Jila Antyavsayi Sahkari Vikas Samiti Marydit Korea (Chhattisgarh) 6 - Om Prakash Sahu S/o Ram Prasad Sahu Aged About 51 Years Working As Field Officer/chief Instructor Jila Antyavsayi Sahkari Vikas Samiti Maryadit Balrampur (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioners Versus * - Chhattisgarh State Antyavasai Sahakari Vitta Evum Vikas Nigam (A Govt. Of Chhattisgarh Undertaking S.T. S.C. O.B.C. And Minority Development) Through Its Managing Director - Atal Nagar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondent For Petitioners : Mr. Bhaskar Payashi, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Vivek Siddhart Ojha, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jha, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 15/05/2026 1. The petitioners have filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.05.15 18:38:10 +0530 2 “10.i. To call for the entire records available in the office of the Respondents pertaining to the case of the petitioners. 10.ii. That the Hon’ble High Court may kindly be pleased to be directed the respondent authority to consider the case of the petitioners for promotion to the post of Executive Officer w.e.f. his immediate junior was promoted with all benefits of promotional post. 10.iii. That the Hon’ble High Court may kindly be pleased to be directed the respondent authority to consider and decide the representation of the petitioners. 10.iv. Any other relief or relief(s) which this Hon’ble Court may think proper in view of the facts and circumstances of the case may also kindly be granted.” 2. Mr. Bhaskar Payashi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Permission granted. 5. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti