Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2012 (MAD)

J. Lourdusamy v. The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police

CRL RC/835/2026 · 2026-04-10

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL RC No. 835 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL RC No. 835 of 2026 J. Lourdusamy S/o.Mr.John, Residing at Door No. A6, 2nd Floor A Block, Vasantha Backiyam Apts, 5th Street, Thirumalai Nagar, Sembakkam. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police Selaiyur Police Station, Tambaram Police Commissionarate, Chennai 600 073. ..Respondent(s) Criminal Revision Case is filed under Section 438 read with 442 of BNSS 2023 to set aside the order dated 13.02.2026 made in Crl.M.P.No. 1658 of 2025 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II at Tambaram and to allow the above Criminal Revision Petition and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): M/S. P. Vignesh For Respondent(s): MR.R.KISHORE KUMAR GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL SIDE) ORDER Criminal Revision Case has been filed seeking to set aside the order dated 13.02.2026 made in Crl.M.P.No. 1658 of 2025 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II at Tambaram. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 835 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. The learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tambaram, dismissed the application on the ground that the issue arises in respect of money transactions and is purely civil nature. 4. This Court had carefully gone through the reasoning given by the learned Magistrate. On perusal of the same, this Court does not find any palpable error or perversity in the said order. It is also admitted that the complaint came to be registered in furtherance of money transactions. 5. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) also submitted that the scope of the revisional jurisdiction is very limited and that, unless there is palpable error, the question of interference does not arise. 6. As rightly contended by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Court does not find any palpable error or perversity in the order passed by the learned Magistrate. 7. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. 10-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No dpa https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 835 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 To 1. The learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tambaram 2.The Inspector of Police Selaiyur Police Station, Tambaram Police Commissionarate, Chennai 600 073. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 835 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. dpa CRL RC No. 835 of 2026 10-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis