Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20117 (ORI)

SEBATI BISHI v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/16460/2026 · 2026-05-22

Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 3. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.16460 of 2026 Sebati Bishi ..... Petitioner Represented by Adv. - Ranjit Samal -versus- state of Odisha and others ..... Opposite Parties Represented by Adv. – Mr. U.C. Jena, ASC CORAM: MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 22.05.2026 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode). 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State-Opposite Parties. Perused the writ petition as well as documents annexed thereto. 3. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: “It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash the Letter bearing No. 1240, Dt.24.09.2024 issued by the Block Education Officer, Bhatli, the Opp. Party No.4 under Annexure-6 and pass a direction to the Opp. Parties to deduct the subscription amount from the salary of the petitioner w.e.f. 2022 onwards for depositing the same in his G.P.F. Account bearing no.0138726PS within a specific time limit fixed by this Hon'ble Court. Page 2 of 3. And pass such other or further order or orders the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper to the facts and circumstances of the case; And for this act of kindness, the petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray.” 4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner may be granted liberty to file a fresh representation ventilating his grievance before the Block Education Officer, Opposite Party No.4 which may be considered within a stipulated period of time in accordance with law. 5. Learned Additional Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that he has no objection if liberty is granted to the Petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Opposite Party No.4 and the same is considered and disposed of in accordance with law. 6. In view of the aforesaid limited nature of grievance of the petitioner, this Court disposes of the writ petition granting liberty to the Petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Opposite Party No.4 ventilating his grievance within a period of three weeks. If such representation is filed within the time stipulated, the same shall be considered and disposed of by the Opposite Party No.4 at Annexure-7 within a period of two months from the date of filing representation by passing a speaking and reasoned order. The decision so taken shall be communicated to the Petitioner within a week from the date of taking such a decision. 7. With the aforesaid observations/ directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Page 3 of 3. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. ( A.K. Mohapatra) Judge Sisir Designation: PERSONAL ASSISTANT