SURYAKANT POSHA PATIL AND ORS v. M/S. JSW STEEL LTD THRU G M AND ORS
WP/12670/2026 · 2026-10-14
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20116 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20116 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
26-WP12670-2026.DOC Santosh IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 12670 OF 2026 Suryakant Posha Patil And Ors ...Petitioner Versus M/s. Jsw Steel Ltd Through G M And Ors …Respondents Mr. Aneesh Deshpande, for the Petitioner.
CORAM:
N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED:
14th OCTOBER, 2026 PC:-
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner.
2. The challenge in this petition is to an order dated 19th August, 2026 passed by the learned Member, Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Mumbai, whereby while setting aside the
order dated 13th June, 2022 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, whereby the dealy in preferring an appeal came to be condoned, the MRT has not interfered with the order dated 2nd June, 2022, whereby the appeal was posted for hearing.
3. Since the MRT has set aside the order dated 13th June, 2022 condoning the delay in preferring the appeal and consequently the prayer for condonation of delay is required to heard and decided first by the Sub-Divisional Officer, it is 1/2 SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2026.10.16 18:08:32 +0530
26-WP12670-2026.DOC clarified that the Sub-Divisional Officer shall first hear and decide the aspect of condonation of delay and in the event of condonation of delay only, the appeal be taken up for hearing and decision in accordance with law.
4. Subject to the aforesaid clarification, the petition stands
disposed.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2