Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20113 (CAL)

BIPLAB BISWAS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/7997/2026 · 2026-05-08

Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

242 08.05. 2026 Ct. No. 24 Ab IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 7997 of 2026 Biplab Biswas Vs. The State of West Bengal and others. --------------- Mr. Ujjal Ray, Mr. Sk. Abdur Rahim. … for the petitioner. 1. Let affidavit-of-service, as filed in Court, be kept on record. 2. In spite of service, none appears on behalf of the school authorities. 3. The petitioner is employed in a non-teaching cadre as a Clerk in a school, being the respondent no. 6. Petitioner’s application for general transfer on the ground of distance has been pending before the school authorities since February 10th, 2025. 4. The school authorities are directed to dispose of the said application, without taking the ground that the petitioner is a single incumbent in the post of Clerk, as the same has already been decided by the Hon’ble Court in Gokul Chandra Mallick vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. in MAT 1218 of 2024 and Rupak Dhua vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. In FMA 995 of 2025. 5. In view of the afore-stated, respondent no. 6 is 2 directed to dispose of the application of the petitioner by May 31st, 2026. In the event such application is allowed, the school authorities will immediately forward the same along with requisite ‘No Objection Certificate’ and declaration to the concerned District Inspector of Schools within a period of two weeks from allowing the application. 6. The concerned District Inspector of Schools will take all consequential steps in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably within four weeks from the date of receipt of the ‘NOC’ and other requisites from the school. 7. The suspension of ‘Utsashree Portal’ will not be an impediment for the concerned authority to consider the application for transfer of the petitioner. The same shall be considered in an offline mode. 8. With the aforestated directions, the writ petition is, thus, disposed of. 9. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. 10. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on usual undertaking. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.) 3