APHC010192612012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 36677/2012 Between: 1.B GANGADHARAM, S/O M BETTAPPA AGED 26 YEARS, OCC: FILED ASST (NOW REMOVED) CHINNARI DODDI (GRAM PANCHAYAT ) SANTHIPURAM MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT , CHITTOOR 2.THE PROJECT DIRECTOR DWMA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT CHITTOOR ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned Proceedings Impugned Orders Roc No: H/D1/3026/2012 dt 23-6-2012 of the 2nd respondent and quash the same as illegal, highhanded arbitrary violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents re instate me into service and continue me in service as Filed Assistant with all consequential benefits in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 46567 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to allow the petitioner to attend the duties by suspending the imppugned orders Roc.No.H/D1/3026/2012 dated 23.06.2012 of the 2nd respondent forthwith in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.CH SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY) 2.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.36677 OF 2012 ORDER : 1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 23.06.2012 passed by the 2nd respondent as illegal. 2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent submits that the order passed by the 2nd respondent is appealable before the Appellate Authority. It is further submitted that this Court has dismissed several writ petitions in similar circumstances and that, since the petitioner has an alternative and effective remedy, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present writ petition. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dated 11.03.2026 KGM 3 143 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.36677 OF 2012 Dated 11.03.2026 KGM