Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27689 WP No. 557 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 557 OF 2015 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN:
LAKSHMINARASIMHAIAH DEAD BY HIS LRS
1. GANGAIAH, S/O LATE LAKSHMINARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
2. RAMAIAH, S/O LATE LAKSHMINARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
3. DODDAIAH, S/O LATE LAKSHMINARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
4. NARASIMHAMURTHY, S/O LATE LAKSHMINARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
ALL ARE R/AT LINGANAHALLI VILLAGE BELLAVI HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK AND DISTRICT PINCODE-572128 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ADAVEESHAIAH B., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE GROUND FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560001.
REP. BY ITS PRL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT.
Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27689 WP No. 557 of 2015
2.
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD NEAR BASAVESWARA CIRCLE BENGALURU-560001 REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
3.
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KIADB, B.H. ROAD, NEAR SIT COLLEGE TUMAKURU-572101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ADITYA DIWAKAR, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1;
SRI. H.L.PRADEEP KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION NO.CI:234:SPQ:2006 DATED 31.07.2006 UNDER SECTION 28(1) AND NOTIFICATION NO.CI:25:SPQ:2007 DATED 27.02.2007 UNDER SECTION 28(4) OF THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT ACT, 1966 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 (STATED AS 3RD RESPONDENT IN THE PRAYER PORTION OF THE PETITION) WITH RESPECT TO PETITIONERS LAND VIDE ANNEXURE- D AND ANNEXURE-E RESPECTIVELY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27689 WP No. 557 of 2015
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioners though the case is called twice in the day. Hence, the Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE
SMA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36