Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20101 (AP)

P.V. RAMA RAJU v. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED

WP/10280/2021 · 2026-01-05

V Sujatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010188162021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 10280/2021 Between: 1. P.V. RAMA RAJU, S/O. KRISHNA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O. 61-13-18, KRISHNAVENI ROAD, RAMALINGESWARA NAGAR, KRISHNALANKA, VIJAYAWADA URBAN, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH, PIN-520013. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED, (APSCSCL) REP. BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, D.NO. 10-152/1, SRI SAI TOWERS, 4TH FLOOR, ASHOKNAGAR, BESIDES SIRIS COMPANY, BANDAR ROAD, KANURU, VIJAYAWADA 2. THE DISTRICT MANAGER, APSCSCL, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 3. THE DEPUTY TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 5. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 6. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA, EAST 2 VS,J W.P.No.10280 of 2021 GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 7. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 8. THE DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 9. THE EAST GODAVARI LORRY OWNERS AND WORKERS ASSOCIATION, AT D.NO. 40-1-102/35, OPP.FCI GOCLOWNS, NEAR PORT RAILWAY STATION, PORT AREA, KAKINACLA - 533001, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY 10. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAJOLE POLICE STATION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 11. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , KARAPA POLICE STATION, KARAPA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 12. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , KJAMPUDI PO LICE STATION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 13. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAVULAPALEM POLICE STATION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 14. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TUNI POLICE STATION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 15. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BIKKAVOLU POLICE STATION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 16. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ANAPARTHI POLICE STATION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 17. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PITHAPURAM POLICE STATION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 18. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SAMALKOT POLICE STATION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 19. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MANDAPETA POLICE STATION,EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 3 VS,J W.P.No.10280 of 2021 20. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAMACHANDRAPURAM POLICE STATION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the official Respondents in (i) not ensuring smooth passage for the petitioner's vehicles, . which are carrying essential commodities under Public Distribution System, and (ii) not taking action against 9th Respondent, which is illegally obstructing the transportation of essential commodities by the Petitioner, as illegal, unjust, arbitrary, discriminatory, without jurisdiction, and contrary to Law and in violation. of the Articles 14, 19 and21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the official Respondents to ensure smooth passage for vehicles carrying essential commodities and take action against 9th Respondent IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the official Respondents to ensure smooth passage for the petitioner's vehicles, which are carrying essential commodities under Public Distribution System, by restraining the 9th Respondent from obstructing the same, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVAS BOBBILI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P HEMA CHANDRA (SC FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES CORP LTD) 2. MD.SALEEM SC For APSCSC Limited,Vijayawda The Court made the following: 4 VS,J W.P.No.10280 of 2021 ORDER: Today when the writ petition came up for hearing, Sri. M. Vinodin Ruth, learned counsel representing Sri. Bobbili Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that no further orders are required in this writ petition and that it has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA 06.01.2026 Gss