1 2026:CGHC:4644 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 353 of 2026 1 - Mangalchand S/o Kamla Prasad Aged About 50 Years Dharkar By Caste, R/o Village Cher, Tehsil Baikunthpur, District Koriya (C.G.) 2 - Dharmendra Kumar S/o Kamla Prasad Aged About 42 Years Dharkar By Caste, R/o Village Cher, Tehsil Baikunthpur, District Koriya (C.G.) 3 - Brajesh Kumar S/o Kamla Prasad Aged About 41 Years Dharkar By Caste, R/o Village Cher, Tehsil Baikunthpur, District Koriya (C.G.) 4 - Roshan S/o Anil Aged About 9 Years Through Legal Guardian Anil, Dharkar By Caste, R/o Village Cher, Tehsil Baikunthpur, District Koriya (C.G.) 5 - Anil S/o Kariya Ram Aged About 37 Years Dharkar By Caste, R/o Village Cher, Tehsil Baikunthpur, District Koriya (C.G.) 6 - Phoolpati W/o Kamla Prasad Aged About 70 Years Dharkar By Caste, R/o Village Cher, Tehsil Baikunthpur, District Koriya (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, District Koriya Collectorate Building, Baikunthpur District Koriya (C.G.) 2 - The Commissioner Surguja Division, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) 3 - The Tahsildar Tahsil Baikunthpur, District Koriya (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Bhaskar Payashi, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Soumitra Kesharwani, Panel Lawyer (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 28.01.2026 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2026.01.29 14:29:27 +0530 2 Constitution of India, seeking following relief(s):- 10.1 To issue appropriate writ/order or suitable direction to the respondent State to produce complete record of proceedings of suo moto revision registered by Collector on 22/07/2017, for kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court. 10.2 To issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, including a writ of certiorari quashing the order passed by Collector (Annex. P/6) on 15/09/2022, directing for deleting the name of petitioners and recording the name of State in revenue records. 10.3 To issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, including a writ of certiorari quashing the order passed by Commissioner (Annex. P/7) on 20/02/2025, dismissing the revenue appeal filed by petitioners. 10.4 To pass such other order or orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case, in the interest of justice. 3. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file better constituted petition. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents/State has no objection to the prayer made by counsel for the petitioners. 5. On due consideration, learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to withdraw this Petition. 6. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 7. Certified copy of the impugned order be returned to the petitioners after retaining a photocopy of the same in the record. 8. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini