APHC010196402015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 705/2015 Between: 1. KONERU RAMESH KUMAR,, S/O RAMACHANDRA RAO, AGED 58 YEARS, R/O R.R.PET,ELURU,.W.G.DT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. B H V S S KISHORE KUMAR, Executive Officer, Sri Venkateswara Swamy Temple, R,R,Pet Eluru,W.G.Dt. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish therespondent/ contemnor for wiifull violation of the orders of the Honble Court in W.P.M.P.No.49238 of 2014 in W.P.No.39258 of 2014 dated 22-12-2014 and pass such other orders and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2015(APPL 2281 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D KODANDARAMA MURTHY Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. The Court made the following: 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 705/2015 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondent for willful disobedience of the orders dated 22.12.2014 passed by this Court in W.P.No.39258 of 2014. 2. This Court passed interim order dated 22.12.2014 in W.P.No.39258 of 2014 which is extracted hereunder: “Respondent No.2, 3 and 4 shall ensure that the orders passed by the Regional Joint Commissioner, M.Z-1, Kakinada through its proceedings No.A2/4982/2013, dated 19.12.2013 are followed until further orders.” 3. The claim of the petitioner herein is that the interim order passed by this Court is not duly comply with and not followed. 4. No notice was issued to the respondent, since 2015. The party respondent in the contempt case is not holding the subject post. The petitioner did not take any steps to implead the concerned parties as respondents. In the meanwhile, the Writ Petition itself is closed as no further orders are necessary, since the petitioner not duly prosecuted the Writ Petition. Moreover, the petitioner is not prosecuting the Contempt Case. In view of the same, no further orders are necessary in the contempt case. 5. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. 3 Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 09.03.2026 TTPPSS 4 42 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) CONTEMPT CASE NO: 705/2015 09.03.2026 TTPPSS