- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27630 W.P. No.16302/2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.16302/2019 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. BAYADA D. NANAIAH S/O LATE SRI BAYADA DEVAIAH AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS SINCE DEAD REP. BY LR’S. 1(a) SMT. GANGAMMA B.N. W/O LATE SRI. B.D. NANAIAH AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/O. CAUVERY NILAYA C/O. A.M. APPAIAH KONDAGERI ROAD, MORNAD POST MADIKERI TALUK, KODAGU-571252. 1(b) SMT. BABITHA B.N. D/O LATE B.D. NANAIAH W/O SRI JAIRAJ N.B. AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT. KADIATHUR VILLAGE KARGUNDA POST, MADIKERI TALUK KODAGU – 571201. 1(c) SMT. HEMALATHA ALIAS MAMATHA A.B. D/O LATE SRI. B.D. NANAIAH W/O APPACHETTOLANDA BOPAIAH A.S. AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT.BALLAMAVATI VILLAGE & POST MADIKERI TALUK, KODAGU-571214. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K.M. SOMASHEKARA, ADV., FOR P1 (a to c) [ABSENT) Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27630 W.P. No.16302/2019 AND: 1. SRI. BAYADA A. PAVAN KUMAR S/O LATE SRI BAYADA D. AIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS REP. BY HIS GPA HOLDER THE SECOND PLAINTIFF. 2. SMT. BAYADA A. JANAKI @ GOMBE W/O LATE SRI. BAYADA D. AIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF BENGOOR VILLAGE BAGAMANDALA NAD MADIKERI TALUK-571 247. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. R.K. MAHADEVA, ADV., FOR R1 & R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDERS DTD:23.3.2019 PASSED ON IA NO.5 AND 6 RESPECTIVELY BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MADIKERI IN EX.PETITION NO.50/2016 VIDE ANNEXURE-J CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE APPLICATIONS i.e., I.A.NOS.5 AND 6 RESPECTIVELY FILED UNDER SECTION 151 CPC & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27630 W.P. No.16302/2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners when the matter is called in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session. Even on 11.03.2026 and 05.06.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE BSR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 4