Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20091 (JHR)

MURLI KUMAR SAHU @ MURLI SAHU v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3861/2026 · 2026-07-13

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:20731] THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3861 of 2026 ------ Murli Kumar Sahu @ Murli Sahu, aged about 27 years, S/o Bigan Sahu R/o New Anand Nagar, Harmu Road, P.O. – G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District- Ranchi. .... .... …. Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party. ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Faiz Ur Rahman, Advocate. For the State : Mrs. Bandana Sinha, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.04 Dated- 13-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Argora P.S. Case No. 151 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under 305(A), 329(4) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner files supplementary affidavit. Keep the same in the record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed theft of 60 grams of gold and 40 grams of silver from the Almirah of the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and only on the basis of his confessional statement and recovery of some stolen articles from his house, he has been implicated in this case and he was also seen in the CCTV camera near the house of the informant. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted petitioner has been in custody since 09.08.2025 as mentioned in para-06 of the bail application. So far, no witness has been examined though, charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Judicial Commissioner, XVII, Ranchi in connection with Argora P.S. Case No. 151 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 13/07/2026 Amar/