Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20085 (JHR)

BHONDA KALINDI @ BHOLA KALINDI @ MOHAN KALINDI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5660/2026 · 2026-07-10

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:20578] THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5660 of 2026 ------ Bhonda Kalindi @ Bhola Kalindi @ Mohan Kalindi, aged about 43 years, S/o Late Durga Kalindi, resident of Krishna Nagar, Dom Para P.O. & P.S.- Balidih, Distict- Bokaro, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party. ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Ms. Prerna Jhunjhunwala, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Sardu Mahto, A.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 10-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Balidih P.S. Case No. 351 of 2025 corresponding to S.T. Case No. 71 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 333, 127(1), 127(2), 115(2), 351(2), 352, 109, 303(2), 324(4), 117(2), 118(1) of the B.N.S. 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was a member of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of common object of the assembly attempted to murder Saurabh Kumar, Rajmani Yadav and the informant by assaulting them with chain socket and iron rod. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that in the meanwhile two witnesses have been examined and the direct and specific allegation of assault is upon Subhash Kalindi and Jharkhi Kalindi and the only allegation against the petitioner is that he was present at the place of occurrence. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted petitioner has been in custody since 19.12.2025 as mentioned in para-15 of the bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named pet itioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Principal and Sessions Judge-I, Bokaro in connection with Balidih P.S. Case No. 351 of 2025 corresponding to S.T. Case No. 71 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 10/07/2026 Amar/