Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20083 (JHR)

PRADIP KUMAR KARMAHE v. ANKITA ANAND

FA/4/2025 · 2026-07-13

Sanjay Prasad, Sujit Narayan Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:20732-DB ) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI F.A. No. 4 of 2025 With I.A. No. 8627 of 2026 --------- Pradip Kumar Karmahe, S/o Late Jay Krishna Karmahe, Aged about 40 years, R/o Geeta Bhawan in front of Agarwal Ashram, Mohalla Jhounsagarhi, P.O. & P.S.- Deoghar, District-Deoghar ..… Appellant Versus Ankita Anand, D/o Sri Koushlesh Jha, Aged about 30 years, R/o-Mouza Rampur By Pass Road, P.O. & P.S.- Rikhiya, District Deoghar ….. Respondent ---------- CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD ---------- For the Appellant : Mr. Ayush, Advocate For the Respondent : None ---------- 06/13.07.2026 I.A. No. 8627 of 2026 Learned counsel for the appellant is present, however, none appears to represent the respondent, though Vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of Mr. Pran Pranay, learned counsel, whose name is also reflecting and it further appears from the record that copy of the instant Interlocutory Application has already been served upon Mr. Pran Pranay, learned counsel for the respondent through Whatsapp No. 969****050. 2. This Interlocutory Application has been filed on behalf of the appellant for withdrawal of the instant appeal on the ground of compromise between the parties. 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that during the pendency of the present appeal, the parties have amicably resolved all their Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:20732-DB ) 2 disputes and differences outside the Court and have entered into a full and final settlement for dissolving their marriage and in view of the aforesaid settlement and compromise, the appellant does not wish to pursue the present First Appeal and prays for permission of this Court to withdraw the same unconditionally. It is further submitted that no prejudice shall be caused to the respondent if the present appeal is permitted to be withdrawn. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant and taking into consideration the statements made at Paragraph No.s 3, 4 and 5 of I.A. No. 8627 of 2026, it appears that the parties have amicably resolved all their disputes and differences outside the Court and have entered into a full and final settlement and do not want to pursue F.A. No. 04 of 2025 anymore. 5. Thus, in view of the above submission made by learned counsel for the appellant and statements made in this I.A. No. 8627 of 2026, this Interlocutory Application is allowed and stands disposed of with liberty to the appellant to withdraw F.A. No. 4 of 2025. F.A. No. 4 of 2025 6. In the light of the above order passed in I.A. No. 8627 of 2026 vide which the Interlocutory Application has been allowed, this F.A. No. 4 of 2025 is dismissed as withdrawn. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Sanjay Prasad, J.) s.m. Dated 13.07.2026