CRWP-4405-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 160 CRWP-4405-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:17.04.2026 Pushpa and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY **** Present: Mr. Sarfaraj Anjum Mor, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Aanand Kumar Maurya, Advocate, for respondent No.5. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY , J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents, as they have attained majority and married against the wishes of their family members. 2. Learned counsel states that the petitioners will be satisfied if the Superintendent of Police, Nuh i.e. respondent No.2 is directed to look into the representation dated 15.04.2026 (Annexure P-5), made to him by them and take appropriate action on the same. 3. As per the averments made, both the petitioners are major and the date of birth of petitioner No.1 is 26.06.2004 and date of birth of DINESH 2026.04.17 17:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-4405-2026 (O&M) 2 petitioner No.2 is 14.04.2003. The copies of their Aadhar cards are appended as Annexures P-1 and P-2 respectively. They got married on 16.04.2026 and the Marriage Certificate is enclosed with the petition as Annexure P-3. 4. Notice of motion. 5. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 and has no objection in deciding the representation filed on behalf of the petitioners. 6. In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of their claim, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to look into the representation dated 15.04.2026 (Annexure P-5) and decide the same expeditiously, in accordance with law. 7. It is however, made clear that this order shall not preclude the authorities to proceed against the petitioners, in case, they are found involved in any other criminal proceedings, instituted/pending against them if there is some evidence that surfaces regarding their involvement in a cognizable offence, for which they may be required by the investigating agency. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE April 17, 2026 dinesh Whether speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DINESH 2026.04.17 17:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document