ISHUV KHAN S/O LATE SHRI RAJJAK v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/15838/2025 · 2026-01-07
Ganesh Ram Meena
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20079 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20079 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:438] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15838/2025 Ishuv Khan S/o Late Shri Rajjak, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Samraya Police Station, Weir District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanay Jareda For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 07/01/2026
1. This anticipatory bail application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.290/2024 registered at Police Station Weir, District Bharatpur for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2) & 324(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the case diary. 4. After going through the contents of the FIR, it is revealed that the complainant who is an eye-witness of the incident and family member of the accused party also has named all those persons who were involved in the incident. The name of the accused-petitioner does not find place in the FIR. [2026:RJ-JP:438] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15838/2025]
5. Having regard the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and so also the fact that the petitioner has not named in the FIR, though the complainant is an eye-witness and family member of the accused-petitioner. In such circumstances, probability of false implication by making development during investigation cannot be ruled out, hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case deems just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused-petitioner. 6.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the accused-petitioner named above in connection with FIR No.290/2024 registered at Police Station Weir, District Bharatpur, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /288