$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010335192024 + RC.REV. 158/2024, CM APPL. 33154/2024 (Stay) & CM APPL. 33155/2024 (Addl.Doc) ABHAY KUMAR JAIN THROUGH LRS AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. S.D. Baloni and Mr. Akshat Sharma, Advocates. versus MADAN MALIK .....Respondent Through: Appearance not given. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR O R D E R % 24.09.2026 1. The present Petition, filed under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, seeks the setting aside of the Order dated 19.02.2024 [“Impugned Order”] passed by the learned CCJ-cum- ARC (Central), Tis Hazari Court, Delhi, in Eviction Petition No. RC ARC No. 818/2019. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, after having advanced submissions for a considerable period of time and on instructions, submit that the parties have settled the matter. It is submitted that in terms of the settlement, the parties agree that the Petitioners will continue to occupy the premises for a further period of nine (09) months from today. 3. It is also agreed as between the parties that a sum of Rs.25,000/- per month payable before the 7th of every month will be paid as use This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/09/2026 at 11:35:38 and occupation charges till such time as the Petitioners vacate the premises. It is also agreed that the said payment shall be made on or before the 7th day of every month. 4. Mr. Sujal Jain, son of Mr. Virender Kumar Jain, who is present in person, submits on behalf of all the Petitioners that an Affidavit of Undertaking, to this effect, will be filed by the Petitioners within a period of two (02) weeks from today setting out therein the aforesaid agreed terms. 5. It is agreed that in the event that the Affidavit(s) of Undertaking is/ are not filed within the said period, the Petitioners would be liable to vacate the premises forthwith. 6. Further, in the event that the terms of the undertaking are not complied with, the Respondent would be at liberty to take such steps as are available in law, inter alia, initiating proceedings for contempt. 7. In view of the aforesaid agreed terms, this Court is of the opinion that no further orders are required to be passed in the present Petition. 8. Accordingly, the present Petition, along with pending applications, if any, stands disposed of. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. SEPTEMBER 24, 2026/nd/va This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/09/2026 at 11:35:38