Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20079 (BOM)

Manisha Kanakaraj Patha (Plaintiff NO.1) v. Chhaya Vivek Shinde (defendant)

TS/200/2026 · 2026-10-14

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

KVM 1/2 5 - TS 200 OF 2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 200/2026 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 1306/2026 MANISHA KANAKARAJ PATHA ….. PLAINTIFF VS CHHAYA VIVEK SHINDE ….. DEFENDANT ALONGWITH TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 1306/2026 MANISHA KANAKARAJ PATHA & ANR. ….. PETITIONERS SMT. VASANTIKA JOSEPH SHINDE ….. DECEASED Adv. Rushikesh S. Kekane a/w. Adv. Priya Mohanlal for the Plaintiff. Adv. Ekta Vinerkar i/b. Laxman Kanal & Associates for the Defendant. CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATE : 14 OCTOBER, 2026 P.C. :- 1) Testamentary Petition No. 1306 of 2026 not on board. Taken on board. 2) Mr. Kekane, learned counsel on instructions of his client, the plaintiff submits that the dispute has been settled between the parties and the consent terms has been entered between the parties KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Digitally signed by KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date: 2026.10.16 11:42:12 +0530 KVM 2/2 5 - TS 200 OF 2026.doc and to that effect, a mediation report has been prepared by the mediator. A copy of the same has been tendered in Court. The same is taken on record. 3) In view of the statement made by the learned counsel, the testamentary suit stands disposed of as withdrawn. 4) In sequel, testamentary petition also stands disposed of. 5) Refund of Court fees, as per rules. [RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]