Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20075 (AP)

R. Raghunatha Rao v. The Registrar (Recruitment)

WP/8947/2011 · 2026-02-01

R Raghunandan Rao, T C D Sekhar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010190382011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 8947/2011 Between: 1. R. RAGHUNATHA RAO, S/O.LATE R. VITTAL RAO FIELD ASSISTANT (ADMIN), OFFICE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE REGISTRAR RECRUITMENT, HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD 2. THE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KURNOOL. KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. G BHEEMESWARA RAO, FIELD ASSISTANT (AMIN) JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE COURT, ALLAGADDA, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. G RAMANJANEYA RAJU, FIELD ASSISTANT (AMIN) SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE COURT, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. G RAMCHANDARAIAH, FIELD ASSISTANT (AMIN) SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE COURT, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. K PEDDAYYA, JUNIOR ASSISTANT JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE COURT, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 7. M SRI LATHA, JUNIOR ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE COURT, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 8. VEERANHADRAIAH AMIN, SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE COURT, ATMAKUR KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus setting aside the impugned proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 07.03.2011 communicated to the writ petitioner in Dis.NO.2192, dated 8.3.2011 by declaring the same as illegal, invalid, unreasonable, irrational, highly arbitrary and unconstitutional IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 11102 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent herein not to effect promotions to any of the juniors to the writ petitioner i.e. who were appointed later to 24.04.1999 without first considering the case of the writ petitioner first for such promotion, pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 18231 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 30890 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased expedite the above writ petition by fixing an early date and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T SREEDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A JAYANTHI The Court made the following order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has retired and is not interested in pursuing the Writ Petition any manner. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed as not pressed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J ____________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J RJS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION No: 8947 of 2011 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R.Raghunandan Rao) 02.02.2026 RJS