Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20072 (CHH)

CHITESHWERI GILHRE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCC/481/2026 · 2026-05-12

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2026:CGHC:22703 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 481 of 2026 Chiteshweri Gilhre W/o Shri Dharmveer Gilhare, Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Kurra, P.O. Patewa, P.S. Gobra Nawapara Tahsil Abhanpur, District Raipur C.G. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Social Welfare Mahanadi Bhavan, Village Rakhi New Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Commissioner Raipur Division Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Collector Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Janpad Panchayat Abhanpur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Project Officer Integrated Child Development Project Abhanpur District- Raipur (C.G.) 6 - Smt. Rehama Begum W/o Shri Jalim Khan Aged About 23 Years R/o Village Kurra, P.S. Gobra Nawapara Tahsil Abhanpur District- Raipur (C.G.) 7 - Smt. Leena Gilhare W/o Shri Mahendra Gilhare Aged About 26 Years R/o Village Kurra, P.S. Gobra Nawapara Tahsil Abhanpur District- Raipur (C.G.) 8 - Smt. Jageshweri Pal W/o Shri Khilawal Pal Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Kurra, P.S. Gobra Nawapara Tahsil Abhanpur District- Raipur (C.G.) 9 - Jyoti Kosaria W/o Shri Ram Kumar Aged About 27 Years R/o Village Kurra, P.S. Gobra Nawapara Tahsil Abhanpur District- Raipur (C.G.) 10 - Smt. Ahilya Devi Janghade W/o Shri Khelan Das Janghade Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Kurra, P.S. Gobra Nawapara Tahsil Abhanpur District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2026.05.15 13:52:20 +0530 2 / 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Satish Surya, Advocate For State /Respondent : Ms. Supriya Upasane, Government Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Order on Board 13/05/2026 1. Heard on application for restoration of WPS No.2225 of 2014 which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide Court order dated 09/02/2026. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that due to unavoidable reasons he could not appear in the case when the matter was called consequently the writ petition WPS No.2225 of 2014 was dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, which is supported by an affidavit, order dated 09/02/2026 passed in WPS No.2225 of 2014 is recalled. Consequently, WPS No.2225 of 2014 is directed to be restored to its original number. 4. Accordingly, the MCC stands disposed of. SD/- SD/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE ashu