[2026:RJ-JP:12862] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3212/2026 Hari @ Hariya @ Vikas S/o Raghunath, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Nayabas Tan Shrirampura, Police Station Dataramgarh, District Sikar (At Present Pooliya Ke Niche Kotputli, District Kotputli Behror.) (At Present At Confined In District Jail, Sikar). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 27/03/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 257/2025 registered at Police Station Dadiya, District Sikar, for the offence(s) under Sections 305(a) and 331(4) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel also submits that the petitioner is in custody since 04.11.2025 and recovery has already been effected. He further submits that co-accused Dhuda Ram @ Handa has been enlarged on bail by Trial Court vide order dated 17.10.2025 itself. He also submits that petitioner has been acquitted in most of the cases instituted against him and rest of the cases are pending for trial, in those cases he is on bail. He further submits that charge-sheet has already been filed and conclusion of trial may take long time, so [2026:RJ-JP:12862] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3212/2026] no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody and therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner hereinabove and submits that there are criminal antecedents against accused-petitioner Hari @ Hariya @ Vikas S/o Raghunath. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner that charge-sheet has already been filed; petitioner is in custody since 04.11.2025; co-accused Dhuda Ram @ Handa has been enlarged on bail by Trial Court vide order dated 17.10.2025 itself and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Hari @ Hariya @ Vikas S/o Raghunath is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not be involved in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station. [2026:RJ-JP:12862] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3212/2026] 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J HEENA/49