Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20067 (RAJ)

VISHVENDRA SINGH TANWAR S/O SHRI SURESH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/18851/2025 · 2026-02-02

Anand Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:4679] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18851/2025 Vishvendra Singh Tanwar S/o Shri Suresh, aged about 31 years, resident of Village Milkipur, Tehsil Hindaun City, District Karauli ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through the Principal Secretary, Medical and Health Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Medical and Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur. 3. State Institute of Health and Family Welfare through its Director, Jhalana Doongri, Jaipur. 4. Kailash Ram S/o Shri Hukama Ram through the Director, State Institute of Health and Family Welfare, Jhalana Doongri, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanveer Ahamad For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 02/02/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since ignoring the certificate of permanent disability issued by Competent Authority on 15.09.2012 relying upon medical re- examination, and despite securing sufficient marks the petitioner was not selected in the recruitment process, he filed S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.257/2025 which was disposed of by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 07.04.2025 with following directions: "Accordingly, the present petitions are disposed of with the aforementioned directions. Rights of the petitioners qua selection [2026:RJ-JP:4679] (2 of 2) [CW-18851/2025] process/appointment shall remain secured, till the petitioners appear before the Medical Board. It is made clear, that the said interim protection shall not create any vested right qua the petitioners and final selection of the petitioners shall remain subject to outcome of the present petitions. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of." 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that in compliance of order dated 07.04.2025 passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the petitioner was subjected to re- examination by the Medical Board for the purpose of assessing his disability and accordingly, the petitioner appeared before the Medical Board, yet till this date outcome of medical examination of the petitioner has not been communicated to him and without even communicating the result of medical examination, the respondents are in the process of giving appointment to other similarly situated specially abled persons. 3. In the aforesaid circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with the directions to the respondents to communicate the result of medical examination conducted by them in compliance of order dated 07.04.2025 and, in case, in the medical examination, it comes out that the petitioner is suffering with benchmark disability, then further action shall be taken by the respondents as per his merit in the recruitment process. 4. Necessary exercise shall be undertaken by the respondents within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/13