Burra Madhu Sudhana Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLP/3092/2021 · 2026-01-21
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20065 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20065 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010182732021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3092/2021 Between:
BURRA MADHU SUDHANA RAO,, S/O. CHINNA NARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC MLA, RIO SIVAPURAM VILLAGE, TANGUTURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI THROUGH SHO, KANIGIRI POLICE STATION, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
2. MITHUKULLA SRINIVASULU, S/O. NARASAIAH, NELTURIGOLLAPALLI VILLAGE, KANIGIRI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. A.P.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. MALIREDDY GOWTHAM Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following:
2 ORDER:
The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity ‘the Cr.P.C.,’)/Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’) seeking to quash the proceedings against the Petitioner/Accused No.10 in C.C.No.33 of 2016 on the file of learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kanigiri was transferred to the learned II Additional District Judge, Vijayawada for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 452, 365, 120(b) read with 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for brevity, ‘the IPC’).
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case in C.C.No.33 of 2016, which was pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kanigiri was transferred to the learned II Additional District Judge, Vijayawada, has ended in acquittal. Hence, requested that the Criminal Petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
3. In view of the above, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 22.01.2026 PRA
3
105 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.3092 of 2021
Date:22.01.2026
PRA