- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27338 CRL.RP No. 192 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.192 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAGHAVENDRA M P S/O SRI PUTTASWAMY GOWDA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS M/S ANVITHA TRADERS NO.22 MADESWARA NAGAR SATHANUR ROAD NEXT TO GANESH TEMPLE CHANNAPATNA TALUK. RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562 160. RESIDING AT MADAPURA AMBADAHALLI POST CHANNAPATNA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562138. (THE RESPONDENT HEREIN HAVE WRONGLY MENTIONED THE PETITIONER'S ADDRESS IN C.C.NO. 53580/2022 AS UNDER) R/O MAHADEVAPURA AKKUR, CHENNAPATTANA TO SATHANUR MAIN ROAD CHENNAPATTANA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 160 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. A.N. SOMEGOWDA, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27338 CRL.RP No. 192 of 2026 AND: 1. SRI. RANJIT KUMAR C S/O SRI.CHANDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT NO.41, KYALASANAHALLI S.R.K. NAGAR ( KOTHANUR ) POST K.R. PURAM, BENGALURU-560 077. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. PRADEEP NAIK K.,ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DAED 23.10.2025 PASSED BY THE LD LXXIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYOHALL UNIT, BENGALURU (CCH-74) IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.25268/2024 THEREBY DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION DATED 09.07.2024 PASSED BY THE XXXIV ADDL.CMM, MAYOHALL, BENGALURU IN CC NO.53580/2022 THEREBY CONVICTING AND SENTENCING THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED TO PAY A FINE OF RS.2,32,400/- ALONGWITH DEFAULT CLAUSE TO UNDER SIMPLE IMPRISONMENT FOR 3 MONTHS AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER (HEREWITH PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A AND B) THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that settlement is going on, but not placed any material regarding compliance of conditional order passed by this Court dated - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27338 CRL.RP No. 192 of 2026 05.02.2026. Hence, question of entertaining the revision petition does not arise. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed, since the conditional order has not been complied with and revision petition is also not yet admitted. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE ST List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6