- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25903 WP No. 16215 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 16215 OF 2026 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. NEELAMMA W/O LATE KENCHAPPA GOWDA,. AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT VALTHAJE HOUSE, CHARVAKA VILLAGE AND POST, KADABA TALUK, D.K DISTRICT -574 328 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SACHIN K. NAIK., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, 1ST FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001 REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND RECOVERY OFFICER PUTTUR SUB-DIVISION, PUTTUR, D.K. DISTRICT - 574 201 3. ADARSH VIVIDHODESHA SAHAKARI SANGHA (NI.) HAVING ITS OFFICE AT APOORVA COMPLE, DARBE, BOLWAR, PUTTUR TALUK, Digitally signed by PRAMILA G V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25903 WP No. 16215 of 2026 D.K DISTRICT - 574 201 REP. BY ITS MANAGER. (REG.UNDER CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1960) …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D NAIK, AGA FOR R1 & R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE AUCTION SALE NOTICE IN FORM NO.8 DATED NIL ISSUED UNDER RULE 38 (2) (D) OF THE KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES RULES, 1960 IN E.P. NO. 84/2025-26 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT AND THE SALE NOTICE IN FORM NO.9 DATED NIL ISSUED UNDER RULE 22 (7) (E) OF KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES RULES, 1960 IN E.P. NO. 84/2025-26 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT, FIXING THE DATE OF AUCTION OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTIES ON 05.06.2026 VIDE ANNEXURES-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25903 WP No. 16215 of 2026 ORAL ORDER Learned AGA accepts notice for respondent No-s.1 and 2. 2. In the instant petition, the petitioner is challenging the sale notice issued by respondent No.2. 3. The said sale notice has been issued in pursuance to an award passed against the borrower, who borrowed the loan from respondent No.3-Co-operative Bank. 4. The petitioner has not challenged the said award. Further, it is noticed that the petitioner is having an alternative and efficacious remedy under Section 105 of The Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959. 5. For the aforementioned reasons, the Writ Petition stands dismissed reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail alternative remedy in the manner known to law. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE GVP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2