RAKESH KUMAR S/O SH. MOHAN RAM v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/15656/2025 · 2026-01-06
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20054 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20054 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:180] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 15656/2025 Rakesh Kumar S/o Sh. Mohan Ram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Banwal, Police Station Peelwa District Deedwana, Kuchaman. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Kishore Tiwari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 06/01/2026
1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.153/2025 registered at Police Station Gegal, District Ajmer for offence under Section 115(2), 126(2) and 109(1) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that allegation levelled against the present is of causing the injury for extorting Rs.50,000/-. He further submits that injuries as shown by the prosecution is sharp but simple in nature. He further contends that date of incident as projected is 30.08.2025 but medical board was constituted in first week of October, 2025. He further submitted that the injury No.5 which is on left eye-brow
[2026:RJ-JP:180] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15656/2025] was shown as dangerous which is not medically possible. Petitioner is behind the bars since 12.09.2025 and charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Rakesh Kumar S/o Sh. Mohan Ram, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/16