Kalluri Babaiah, S/o. K. Babaiah v. The Union of India
WP/5386/2013 · 2026-03-08
Harinath N
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20054 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20054 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010179112013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 5386/2013 Between:
1. KALLURI BABAIAH, S/O. K. BABAIAH, OCC: EX-SIPAI CT/GD, R/O.
D.NO. 7/680, DRIVER KOTAL, PRODDUTUR TALUK, KADAPA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI.
2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, INDO TIBETAN BORDER POLICE FORCE, BLOCK-II, CGO COMPLEX, LODI ROAD, NEW DELHI.
3. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL, INDO TIBETAN BORDER POLICE FORCE, 7/596 JANAKIPURAM EXTN., LUCKNOW, UTTAR PRADESH.
4. THE COMMANDANT, 42ND BATTALION, INDO TIBETAN BORDER POLICE FORCE, JODHPUR, RAJASTHAN.
...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K S MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. C SUNIL KUMAR REDDY
2. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
3. S SIVA KUMARI The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:-
It is submitted that the efforts to contact the writ petitioner did not yield any results and that the writ petition was filed challenging the order of termination of the petitioner's services. Considering the submission that there are no instructions from the petitioner.
2. Recording the same, the writ petition is closed, leaving it open for the petitioner to take appropriate steps. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
Dt: 09.03.2026 SR