. ( 2026:HHC:34491 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.1146 of 2026 Date of decision: 17.08.2026 Parveen Kumar ….Petitioner Versus Nipun Jindal & another ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Issue notice. Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate, appears and wavies service of notice on behalf of the respondents and has placed on record copy of order dated 02.05.2026, wherein, it has been stated that the case of the petitioner fulfills all requisite criteria for grant of pensionery and other retiral benefits as per CCS, Pension Rules 1972 and CCS, Leave Rules, 1972. The Finance and Pension branch of the Corporation has been directed to do the needful, in terms of release of such benefits to the petitioner, at the earliest. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2 . ( 2026:HHC:34491 ) 2. Therefore, in view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to assail the aforesaid consideration order in accordance with law, if he still remains aggrieved. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge August 17, 2026 (reena)