Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20051 (JHR)

IMTIYAJ ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/4907/2026 · 2026-07-13

Sri Ananda Sen

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:20624 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 4907 of 2026 Imtiyaj Ansari, S/o Razak Ansari, R/o Village- Pulatu, PO Kumhariya, P.S. Pithoria, District Ranchi .... Petitioner(s). Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.The Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi 3.The S.A.R. (Schedule Area Regulation) Officer, Ranchi, P.O. + P.S. Ranchi, District Ranchi 4.Sukhram Munda, S/o Late Bideshi Munda, R/o Village Pulatu, P.O. Kumhariya, P.S. Pithoria, District Ranchi … Respondent(s). …… CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saurav Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Varun Prabhakar, AC to G.P.-III …...... 02/ 13.07.2026: Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State 2. The order passed under Section 71-A of the CNT Act has been challenged directly by filing an application under Article 226 of the Constitution. 3. The parties admit that the order is appealable. 4. Since there is provision of statutory appeal available to the petitioner, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition, the same is dismissed. 5. The petitioner should avail the alternative remedy available to the petitioner. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 13th July, 2026 R.S./ Uploaded on 14/07/2026