Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20051 (AP)

N. Satyanarayana v. State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary to

WP/2108/2014 · 2026-02-08

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HN, J W.P.No.2108_2014 APHC010193442014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 2108/2014 Between: 1. N. SATYANARAYANA,, S/O. REDDAPPA, AGED 58 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE, RIO. GANDABOYANAPALLE VILLAGE, VAYALPADU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO, GOVERNMENT, PLANNING & CO-OPERATION (CO-OP-IV) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD. 2. THE CHITTOOR COOPERATIVE SUGARS LIMITED, CHITTOOR, ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of 2nd respondent in relieving the petitioner from Service as Centrifugal Mate [S6116], from its services, without continuing him in service till the final order is passed pursuant to notice in Rc. No. CCS:ESTT:OM: 2013, dt. 27.11.2013 issued by 2nd respondent and till attainment of age of superannuation, as illegal, irregular, irrational and also violative of articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into services of 2nd respondent and continue till completion of 60 years of age and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 2568 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 2nd respondent to reinstate the petitioner into services of 2nd respondent as Centrifugal Mate [S6116] and continue till completion of 60 years of age, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIVA SANKARA RAO BORRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. T BALAJI 2. GP FOR COOPERATION 2 HN, J W.P.No.2108_2014 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 2108 of 2014 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that the cause in the writ petition no longer survives for consideration. In view of the subsequent developments, the grievance raised in the writ petition has either been redressed or has otherwise become infructuous. 2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel on either side, and taking into consideration that the cause in the present writ petition would not survive any further, this writ petition stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:09.02.2026 NKA 3 HN, J W.P.No.2108_2014 411 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 2108 of 2014 Date: 09.02.2026 NKA