Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20049 (BOM)

SANJAY ASARAM MOHITE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BA/1601/2026 · 2026-10-13

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

922.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 922 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1601 OF 2026 Sanjay Asaram Mohite VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra ….. Mr. Wakale Vijay Shivaji, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. V. K. Kotecha, APP for the Respondent - State ….. CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. DATE : 13.10.2026 PER COURT : 1. After expressing disinclination to grant the relief sought, the learned Advocate for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present Application with liberty to file a fresh application after a period of six months from today, in case the trial is not concluded by then. 2. The learned APP, upon perusal of the record, submits that, there are thirteen witnesses, who are to be examined in the present case. He submits that, the Prosecution shall make every effort to conclude the trial within a period of six months. 3. Taking into consideration the statement made by the learned APP, liberty is granted to the present Applicant to file an appropriate application before the learned Trial Court upon expiry of six months from today, in the event the trial has not substantially progressed. 1 2026:BHC-AUG:49231 922.odt 4. Application stands disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty as prayed for. [HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.] Sameer/Oct-2026 2