Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26758 CP No. 91 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA CIVIL PETITION NO. 91 OF 2026 BETWEEN:
SMT. SHRUTHI P D/O PURUSHOTHAM W/O KUSHALKUMAR.M.G @ PUTTA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, PRESENTLY R/AT, NO. 124, IIIRD CROSS, PRAGATHIPURA, BANASHANKARI II STAGE, BANGALURU - 560 070. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PARAMESHWARAPPA M.V, ADVOCATE) AND:
SRI. KUSHAL KUMAR M.G @ PUTTA S/O M.GOVINDACHAR, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT NO.21ST CROSS, V.V. NAGARA, KALLAHALLI, MANDYA - 571 401. …RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS CP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 24 OF CPC, PRAYING TO WITH DRAW THE CASE MC NO.211/2025 PENDING BEFORE THE HONBLE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, AT MANDYA AND TRANSFER THE SAME FOR TRIAL AND DISPOSAL OF THE PRINCIPAL FAMILY COURT NYAYADEGULA AT BENGALURU.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by PADMASHREE SHEKHAR DESAI Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26758 CP No. 91 of 2026
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner is present. Inspite of service of notice to the respondent, counsel for the respondent or respondent has not turned up and set ex-parte.
2. Heard the arguments of learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. This petition is filed by petitioner-wife for transfer of M.C. No.211/2025 filed by husband for divorce before the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM., at Mandya to the Principal Family Court, Bangalore.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the petitioner is residing along with her parents in Bengaluru. Her marriage with the respondent was performed on 18.05.2020 and they are not blessed with any children. She gave complaint against her husband and his parents on 08.12.2025 in Crime No.80/2025 before the Women
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26758 CP No. 91 of 2026
Police Station, Mandya. She also filed Crl.Mis.No.60/2026 for maintenance before the Principal Family Court, Bangalore. She stated that the distance between Bangalore and Mandya is 102 kilometers and it is inconvenient for her to travel all the way.
5. Considering the reasons stated by the learned counsel for petitioner, as there is no representation by the respondent's counsel, this Court finds it just and reasonable to transfer M.C.No.211/2025 from the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM., Mandya to the Principal Family Court, Bangalore. Ordered accordingly.
6. In the result, the petition is allowed. IA is closed in view of disposal of the main petition.
Sd/- (P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE
PSJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12