MAINODDIN ALIMODDIN SAYYAD v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
BA/1809/2026 · 2026-10-13
Public Interest Litigationbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20042 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20042 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
928.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 928 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1809 OF 2026 Mainoddin Alimoddin Sayyad VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra ….. Mr. Deshmukh Javed Abdul H., Advocate for Applicant Mr. S. A. Gaikwad, APP for the Respondent - State …..
CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. DATE : 13.10.2026 PER COURT :
1. Upon the Court expressing its disinclination to grant the relief prayed for, the learned Advocate for the Applicant, upon instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present Application with liberty to file a fresh application in the event there is no substantial progress in the trial.
2. The learned APP submits that, there are about twelve to thirteen witnesses proposed to be examined and therefore there is a possibility that the trial may be concluded within a period of one year.
3. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned APP, permission to withdraw the application is granted. The Application stands disposed of as withdrawn.
4. In the event the trial does not substantially progress, the Applicant shall be at liberty to file a fresh application before the 1 2026:BHC-AUG:49227
928.odt learned Trial Court. If such an application is filed, the learned Trial Court shall decide the same on its own merits.
5. The learned Advocate for the Applicant submitted during the course of arguments that the Applicant is suffering from piles.
6. The Jail Authorities are directed to provide all the necessary medical facilities to the Applicant.
[HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.] Sameer/Oct-2026 2