Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20041 (CAL)

DIPSIKHA CHOWDHURY AND ANR v. ARNAB PAUL AND ORS

MAT/356/2026 · 2026-05-15

Partha Sarathi Sen, Sujoy Paul

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ct.No.1 D/L 15.05.2026 25 Saikat Mukherjee MAT/356/2026 with IA NO: CAN/1/2026 with IA NO: CAN/2/2026 DIPSIKHA CHOWDHURY AND ANR. VS. ARNAB PAUL AND ORS. Mr. Sayan Sinha, Adv. Mr. Adil Naser, Adv. …For the Appellant Mr. Gourav Ghosh, Adv. Mr. Sounak Mondal, Adv. …For the Respondent No.1 Mr. Ranajit Chowdhury, Adv. Mr. Sudipto Chowdhury, Adv. Ms. Sampoorna Saha, Adv. …For the Respondent No.7/Bank Dictated by Partha Sarathi Sen, J. 1. Parties are represented through their respective learned advocates. 2. At the time of hearing learned advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant/writ petitioner submits that a written instruction dated 15th May, 2026, has been received by him from Petitioner No.2 through mail. 3. Let the instruction be taken on record. 4. It is submitted upon instruction on behalf of the writ petitioners that the instant appeal may be disposed of as withdrawn. 5. In view of such submission, the instant appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. 6. With the disposal of the instant appeal, the pending interlocutory applications are also disposed of. 7. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. (SUJOY PAUL, CJ.) (PARTHA SARATHI SEN, J.)