Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20040 (BOM)

THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS v. BHIMRAO CHUDAJI MISAL AND ORS

CA/13463/2010 · 2026-10-12

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 245 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1661 OF 2015 THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS VERSUS BHIMRAO CHUDAJI MISAL AND ORS ... Mr. D.R. Korde, AGP for appellants Mr. D.R. Jayabhar, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 9 ... WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13463 OF 2010 IN FA/1661/2015 ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 12th OCTOBER, 2026 ORDER : . Heard learned AGP for the appellants. 2 By this appeal, the appellants assail the Judgment and Award dated 11.08.2008 passed by the learned District Judge-2, Beed in Land Acquisition Reference No.38 of 2007. 3 Learned AGP for the appellants submits that the compensation 2026:BHC-AUG:48724 2 245_FA_1661_2015 enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. 4 In view of the aforesaid submissions and having regard to the policy decision of the State Government contained in Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with Corrigenda dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only up to four times. 5 Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned order. Hence, the present appeal is dismissed. 6 The claimants are at liberty to withdraw the amount deposited by the State/acquiring body before the learned Reference Court, if any. 7 In view of dismissal of the appeal, pending Civil Application, if any, does not survive and is disposed of accordingly. ( SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. ) agd