Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:22578
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 662 of 2026 Sunil Singh Son Of Rajkumar Singh Aged About 37 Years Occupation Service Resident Of Bagiya Havelaram Friends Colony P. S. Civil Line Itawa,tahsil And District Itawa Uttar Pradesh
... Applicant versus Laxmi Singh Wife Of Sunil Singh Aged About 36 Years Resident Of Narmada Vihar Colony, Post Ganj, Indira Gandhi Ward, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent For Applicants : Mr. Pradeep Kumar Jogi, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 13.05.2026
1. Heard Mr. Pradeep Kumar Jogi, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. The present revision has been filed by the applicant with the following prayer:
“ It is therefore, that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allowed criminal revision and set-aside impugned order dated 30.10.2018 passed by the learned First Additional Principal Judge Family Court Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh in M.J.C. No. 435/2017 which is arising out of impugned order dated 28.03.2012 passed by the learned First Additional Principal Judge Family Court Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh in M.J.C. case No. 262/2009 which is arising out of impugned order dated 27.07.2006 passed by the learned First Additional Principal Judge Family Court Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh in Misc. Civil case No. 218/2006, in the interest of justice. ”
3. The present criminal revision is beyond time as has been reported by the Registry.
4. From perusal of application for condonation of delay, it is apparent that RAJSHEKHAR SONI Digitally signed by RAJSHEKHAR SONI
2 the applicant has not given day to day explanation of inordinate delay of 2618 days in filing the revision, as such, the revision is barred by delay and laches and is not liable to be entertained.
5. Considering the grounds raised in I.A. No. 02/2026, I do not find any good ground to condone the delay of 2618 days in preferring the revision.
6. Accordingly, I.A. No. 02/2026 is rejected and consequently thereto, the revision is also dismissed.
Sd/-
(Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rajshekhar