- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27082 CRL.RP No. 372 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.372 OF 2026 (397(CR.PC)/438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: S.A. RAHIM S/O S.A.ALIM AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS PROP. SADATH ENTERPRISES HOLALUR, HOLALUR POST-577216 SHIVAMOGGA TALUK AND DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. P.N.HARISH, ADVOCATE) AND: H G RAJAPPA S/O SHEKARAPPA @SHEKARAPPA GOWDA AGED 46 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST R/O HARAMAGHATTA VILLAGE, SHIVAMOGGA TALUK-577216 SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 10.12.2025 PASSED BY THE COURT OF LD I ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE, SHIVAMOGGA IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.31/2025 AND THE JUDGEMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION DATED 15.02.2025 PASSED BY THE COURT OF LEARNED JMFC-II SHIVAMOGGA IN CC NO.512/2014 CONVICTING THE PETITIONER FOR AN OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I ACT SENTENCING HIM TO PAY A FINE OF RS.4,20,000/- AND IN DEFAULT TO UNDER SIMPLE IMPRISONMENT FOR A PERIOD OF SIX MONTHS BY ALLOWING THIS REVISION PETITION AND ETC. Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27082 CRL.RP No. 372 of 2026 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that this Court, on 28.04.2026, passed an order directing the petitioner to deposit 50% of the fine amount, inclusive of the fine amount already in deposit, within four weeks from the date of the order. However, he submits that the said order has not been complied with and that no application seeking extension of time has been filed. 2. When such being the case, the question of considering this revision petition does not arise that too when the revision petitioner has not complied with the order and has also not filed any application seeking extension of time, and this revision has not been admitted. 3. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE HA