[2026:RJ-JP:5459] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18524/2025 1. Osaf Shah S/o Dilip Shah, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 30, Near Raj Public School, Fakiro Ki Choti Dungari, Bas Badanpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Dilip Shah S/o Late Idu Khan, R/o 30, Near Raj Public School, Fakiro Ki Choti Dungari, Bas Badanpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Home Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. S.H.O. Police Station Manik Chowk, Badi Chopar, Jaipur. 4. Shri Narendra, A.S.I., Police Station Manik Chowk, Badi Chopar, Jaipur. 5. Shri Mohan Lal, H.C., Police Station Manik Chowk, Badi Chopar, Jaipur. 6. Usha Rani Wife of Satish Agarwal, R/o Mangori Walo Ki Bagichi, Brahmpuri, Jaipur. 7. Satish Agarwal S/o Not Known, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Mangori Walo Ki Bagichi, Brahmpuri, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sampat Lal Songara For Respondent(s) : Mr. Parth Sharma, for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma Mr. Rakesh Khyalia, SHO, PS-Manik Chowk, Jaipur HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 05/02/2026 1. The instant writ petition is filed by the petitioners with the following prayer:- [2026:RJ-JP:5459] (2 of 2) [CW-18524/2025] “(i) By appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, verbal order of threatening/ illegal vacation of shop dated 19-11-25 conveyed by Respondent No. 4 & 5 be quashed and set aside & Respondent No. 1 & 2 may kindly be directed to take appropriate legal action against the respondent No. 4 & 5 and suitable damages be awarded to the petitioner. (ii) Respondent No. 1 & 2 may further be directed to take suitable action so that respondent No. 4 & 5 may not misuse their police power and petitioner may not be harassed.” 2. In view of the averments and the allegations made in the writ petition, the Court, vide order dated 04.02.2026, directed the SHO, Police Station Manik Chowk, Badi Chopar, Jaipur to remain personally present before this Court. 3. Today, the SHO is present before this Court. He states that there was a complaint by respondent No.7-Satish Agarwal against the petitioners and to make an inquiry into the allegations in the complaint, the petitioners were summoned at the police station. SHO further states that both the parties have settled the dispute between them and in view of the settlement between the parties, the complaint has also been closed. 4. Taking into consideration the statements made by the SHO of Police Station Manik Chowk, Badi Chopar, Jaipur, the Court is of the opinion that there remains no further cause of action with the petitioners to pursue this writ petition. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. 6. Pending application/s, if any, also stand/s disposed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /190