Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 / 2
2026:CGHC:21619-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2247 of 2024 1 - Venkat Manikram Shinde S/o Manikrao Shinde Aged About 62 Years R/o Yashasvi, Sector-2, Plot No. 38, Indrayani Nagar, Bhosri, Pune (Maharastra) 2 - Shivaji Manikram Shinde S/o Manikrao Shinde Aged About 51 Years R/o Yashasvi, Sector-2, Plot No. 38, Indrayani Nagar, Bhosri, Pune, (Maharastra)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Home, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Station House Officer Police Station - Ganj, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Dinesh Agrawal S/o S.S. Agrawal Authorized Representative Of R.R. Industrial Operations India Ltd. (Old Name - R.R. Industrial Corporation India Pvt. Ltd.), Registered Office At - Telghani Naka, Station Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, (Complainant / Informant) ... Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioners
: Mr. Hari Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 /State : Mr. Priyank Rathi, G.A. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble
Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
Hon'ble
Mr. Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
, Judge
Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 08.05.2026
1. Heard Mr. Hari Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Priyank Rathi, learned Govt. Advocate, appearing for the State / respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Digitally signed by JYOTI JHA Date: 2026.05.11 11:21:26 +0530
2 / 2
2. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. with the following prayers :
“A. Kindly call for the relevant records from the concerned authorities/Court below relating to the petitioners case for its kind perusal. B. Kindly pass appropriate order quashing the FIR (Annexure A-1) and all subsequent actions as registration of FIR & continuance of , if any, criminal proceedings, itself amounts to abuse of process of court and abuse of process of law and in the facts and circumstances of the case. C Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts & circumstance of case.”
3. Learned State counsel has pointed out that investigation has completed and charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioners and the case is fixed for framing of the charge. 4. In view of the same, we are not inclined to interfere with the matter, at this stage, accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed leaving it open to the petitioners to raise all the objections at an appropriate stage before the trial Court.
Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice
Jyoti