Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20032 (KAR)

M/S PATHAK DEVELOPERS PVT LTD., v. SUJATHA S

CRL.RP/1524/2025 · 2026-06-09

H P Sandesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27407 CRL.RP No. 1524 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1524 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. M/S. PATHAK DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD., BUILDERS AND PROMOTERS REG. OFFICE NO.2297/2 2ND FLOOR, RUKMA COMPLEX KALIDASA ROAD, MYSURU -02 R/BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRIHARI PATHAK. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SUJATHA S., W/O JAVAREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/AT NO.97/E, I FLOOR VISHWAKARMA COLONY GAYATHRIPURAM MYSURU-02 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SHIVARAMU H.C., ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S. 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF SENTENCE DATED 16.04.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED V ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE IN CRL.A NO.166/2024 AND THE ORDER OF SENTENCE AND CONVICTION DATED 22.02.2024 PASSED BY THE LEARNED VI ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC MYSURU IN CC NO.417/2019. Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27407 CRL.RP No. 1524 of 2025 THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent. 2. This matter is listed for consideration of I.A.No.1/2026, wherein prayer is sought for vacating the interim order dated 12.01.2026 on the ground that conditional order dated 12.01.2026 has not been complied within a period of four weeks. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that interim order dated 12.01.2026 has not been complied with. 4. When such being the case, when the interim order has not been complied with and the revision petition is not yet admitted, question of entertaining the revision petition does not arise and no ground is made out to entertain the revision petition. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20